Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 05:36

Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Thank you.
SEC clears Trump Media filing, opening door to multi-billion-dollar Bitcoin buy - The Block
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
What’s next?
What is your review on the Last of Us Part 2?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
What are the best AI tools for recruiting?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Why Fans Think Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce Might Already Be Married - instyle.com
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years:
How do I cancel WFG Life insurance?
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.